Product Code Database
Example Keywords: dress -ps3 $5
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Literal And Figurative Language
Tag Wiki 'Literal And Figurative Language'.
Tag

The distinction between literal and figurative language exists in all ; the phenomenon is studied within certain areas of analysis, in particular , , and .

  • Literal language is the usage of exactly according to their direct, straightforward, or conventionally accepted meanings: their .
  • Figurative (or non-literal) language is the usage of words in addition to, or deviating beyond, their conventionally accepted definitions
(2001). 9780198027126, Oxford University Press. .
" Figurative language refers to words or phrases that are meaningful, but not literally true." in order to convey a more complex meaning or achieve a heightened effect." Figure of speech." Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Inc. 2015 "figure of speech ...: a form of expression (such as a simile or metaphor) used to convey meaning or heighten effect often by comparing or identifying one thing with another that has a meaning or connotation familiar to the reader or listener". This is done by language-users presenting words in such a way that their audience equates, compares, or associates the words with normally unrelated meanings. A common intended effect of figurative language is to elicit audience responses that are especially emotional (like excitement, shock, laughter, etc.), aesthetic, or intellectual.

The philosopher , and later the Roman rhetorician , were among the early documented language analysts who expounded on the differences between literal and figurative language.

(2025). 9780495898023, Cengage Learning. .
A comprehensive scholarly examination of metaphor in antiquity, and the way its use was fostered by 's epic poems and , is provided by William Bedell Stanford.W. Bedell Stanford, Greek Metaphor (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1936)

Within literary analysis, the terms "literal" and "figurative" are still used; but within the fields of cognition and linguistics, the basis for identifying such a distinction is no longer used.

(2025). 9780080965000, Elsevier. .


The meaning of literal language
Literal usage confers meaning to words, in the sense of the meaning words have by themselves,
(2025). 9781588112071, John Benjamins Publishing. .
for example as defined in a dictionary. It maintains a consistent meaning regardless of the context,
(2025). 9780195111095, Oxford University Press. .
with the intended meaning of a phrase corresponding exactly to the meaning of its individual words.
(2025). 9780863778674, Taylor & Francis. .
On the other hand, figurative use of language (a later offshoot being the term figure of speech) is the use of words or phrases with a meaning that does make literal sense but that encourages certain mental associations or reflects a certain type of truth,
(2025). 9780415346337, Taylor & Francis. .
perhaps a more artistically presented one.


Figurative language
Uses of figurative language, or figures of speech, can take multiple forms, such as , , , and many others.
(2025). 9780203597118, Routledge. .
Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature says that figurative language can be classified in five categories: resemblance or relationship, emphasis or , figures of sound, verbal games, and errors.
(1995). 9780877790426, Merriam-Webster. .

A Origin: 1350–1400; Middle English < Latin: image, likeness, comparison, noun use of neuter of similis similar. is a comparison of two things, indicated by some connective, usually "like", "as", "than", or a verb such as "resembles" to show how they are similar.Kennedy, X. J., and . An Introduction To Poetry. 13th ed. Longman Pub Group, 2007. p. 594.

Example: "His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry.../And the beard on his chin was as white as the snow." (emph added)—Clement Clark Moore
(1993). 9780395665916, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. .

A Origin: 1525–35; < Latin metaphora < Greek metaphorá a transfer, akin to metaphérein to transfer. See meta-, -phore is a figure of speech in which two "essentially unlike things" are shown to have a type of resemblance or create a new image. The similarities between the objects being compared may be implied rather than directly stated.

(2025). 9780439098441, Scholastic Inc.. .
The literary critic and rhetorician, I. A. Richards, divides a metaphor into two parts: the vehicle and the tenor.I. A. Richards, The Philosophy of Rhetoric (New York: Oxford University Press, 1936), 119–127.
Example: "Fog comes on little cat feet"—
(2025). 9781583413401, The Creative Company. .
In this example, “little cat feet” is the vehicle that clarifies the tenor, “fog”. A comparison between the vehicle and tenor (also called the teritium comparitionis) is implicit: fog creeps in silently like a cat.

An extended metaphor is a metaphor that is continued over multiple sentences.

(1994). 9780156724005, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. .
Example: "The sky steps out of her daywear/Slips into her shot-silk evening dress./An entourage of bats whirr and swing at her hem, ...She's tried on every item in her wardrobe."
(2025). 9780435150983, Heinemann. .

is a word designed to be an imitation of a sound.Origin: 1570–80; < Late Latin < Greek onomatopoiía making of words = onomato- (combining form of ónoma name) + poi- (stem of poieîn to make; see poet) + -ia -ia

Example: “Bark! Bark!” went the dog as he chased the car that vroomed past.

Origin: 1745–55; personi(fy) + -fication is the attribution of a personal nature or character to inanimate objects or abstract notions, especially as a rhetorical figure.

Example: "Because I could not stop for Death,/He kindly stopped for me;/The carriage held but just ourselves/And Immortality."—. Dickinson portrays death as a carriage driver.
(2025). 9781440695636, Penguin. .

An is a figure of speech in which a pair of opposite or contradictory terms is used together for emphasis.Origin: < post-classical Latin oxymoron, figure of speech in which a pair of opposed or markedly contradictory terms are placed in conjunction for emphasis (5th cent.; also oxymorum) < ancient Greek ὀξυ-oxy- comb. form1+ μωρόςdull, stupid, foolish (see moron n.2).

Examples: Organized chaos, Same difference, Bittersweet.

A is a statement or proposition which is self-contradictory, unreasonable, or illogical.Origin: < Middle French, French paradoxe (1495 as noun; 1372–74 in plural paradoxesas the title of a work by Cicero; paradoxon (noun) philosophical paradox in post-classical Latin also a figure of speech < ancient Greek παράδοξον, especially in plural παράδοξαStoical paradoxes, use as noun of neuter singular of παράδοξος (adjective) contrary to received opinion or expectation < παρα-para- prefix1+ δόξαopinion (see doxology n.), after ancient Greek παρὰ δόξαν contrary to expectation

Example: This statement is a lie.

is a figure of speech which uses an extravagant or exaggerated statement to express strong feelings.Origin: < Greek ὑπερβολήexcess (compare hyperbola n.), exaggeration; the latter sense is first found in Isocrates and Aristotle. Compare French hyperbole (earlier yperbole).

Example: They had been walking so long that John thought he might drink the entire lake when they came upon it.

is a reference to a famous character or event.

Example: A single step can take you through the looking glass if you're not careful.

An is an expression that has a figurative meaning often related, but different from the literal meaning of the phrase.

Example: You should keep your eye out for him.

A is an expression intended for a humorous or rhetorical effect by exploiting different meanings of words.

Example: I wondered why the ball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.


Use of literally non-literally
Commentators have often noted (and sometimes criticized) how the word literally itself is very commonly now used non-literally to intensify the meaning of a sentence (as in "I literally died of laughter", where clearly the speaker did not die). Far from this being a recent development, however, this usage goes at least as far back as the 19th century. 's 1769 novel The History of Emily Montague was used in the earliest Oxford English Dictionary (OED) citation for the figurative sense of literally; the sentence from the novel used was: "He is a fortunate man to be introduced to such a party of fine women at his arrival; it is literally to feed among the lilies." This citation was also used in the OED's 2011 revision.


Standard pragmatic model of comprehension
Prior to the 1980s, the "standard pragmatic" model of comprehension was widely believed. In that model, it was thought the recipient would first attempt to comprehend the meaning as if literal, but when an appropriate literal inference could not be made, the recipient would shift to look for a figurative interpretation that would allow comprehension.
(1998). 9780195109634, Oxford University Press. .
Since then, research has cast doubt on the model. In tests, figurative language was found to be comprehended at the same speed as literal language; and so the premise that the recipient was first attempting to process a literal meaning and discarding it before attempting to process a figurative meaning appears to be false.
(2025). 9781841693590, Taylor & Francis. .


Reddy and contemporary views
Beginning with the work of Michael Reddy in his 1979 paper "", many linguists now deny that there is a valid way to distinguish between a "literal" and "figurative" mode of language.
(1993). 9780521405614, Cambridge University Press. .
Nevertheless, work has continued on making such a distinction. For example:
(2025). 9789027239044, John Benjamins Publishing Company. .


See also


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time